The Advertising Standards Authority and Rimmel

Rimmel has been given a roasting by the ASA for using lash inserts on Georgia May Jagger in their ads for Rimmel (owned by Coty) Mascara. Both magazine and TV ads show Georgia with lashes getting progressively longer. Ultimately the ASA felt that the ads were misleading, and although Rimmel had run a very tiny disclaimer saying they were ‘shot with inserts’, the ASA felt because the ad showed GMJ in three separate shots with lashes getting progressively bigger and longer (thanks to longer inserts), it didn’t reflect the mascara correctly. The ads can’t appear again in their current form, although this may mean that something as simple as re-sizing the disclaimer to make it acceptable.

So, two things. It’s crazy in the first instance that mascara brands can even think of using lash inserts on models to pretend that’s how your lashes will look after using the mascara. It’s simply misleading from the very beginning and deliberately so. It’s absolutely not fair to ‘pretend’ to potential consumers they might look better than they actually will and the beauty industry is one of the worst offenders for skewing the truth when it comes to advertising. In the days before lash inserts were available, models would spend a very dull few hours having their lashes dyed, mascara’d and then separated individually with a pin by a make up artist before the shots were taken. But, at least if you were prepared to get your pin cushion out you stood a tiny chance of replicating the look. With lash insert ads, unless you’ve spotted the small print, it’s just not going to happen for you.

Secondly thing: it just takes one person to complain – and apparantly in this instance it was one person that complained about the GMJ ad – for the ASA to act. And so I wonder whether it’s now the norm for people to assume that lash inserts are used (actually part of Rimmel’s defence) in mascara ads (and extentions in hair ads etc) so now that it is a commonplace occurence, nobody complains any more. Since when did we not mind that what we are being sold on TV and in print beauty ads isn’t actually what we are getting?


Discover more from British Beauty Blogger

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Have your say

16 responses to “The Advertising Standards Authority and Rimmel”

  1. I have a real bee in my bonnet about the lash inserts used in mascara adverts. What is the point? I want to see what a product can do not look at a picture of someone with great lashes. I admit I scoff at the Cheryl Cole shampoo adverts too…

  2. I will admit to taking for granted that mascara adverts are faked using computers and falsies. I pay more attendtion to the blurb rather than the imagery. It’s kind of sad for the advertisers that all the money spent on the image is wasted because so many of us ignore it because we know it’s completely fake x

  3. To be honest though, don’t we all know that all mascara adverts claim things that are never going to happen to our eyelashes? I don’t even buy mascaras that are advertised anymore, at least I have never seen Guerlain Le 2 or Givenchy Phenomeneyes advertised and they really are very good. Even my short thin lashes look pretty good when I use those mascaras. Enter Lash Stiletto and friends and the effect is quite noticably different. So I’m cynical every time I see a mascara advert and don’t bother with it anymore. Same with hair products. Or foundation. Or pretty much any beauty products. I rely on swatches and reviews by bloggers instead which are (almost) always honest.

  4. Lash inserts and hair extensions are a complete no-no.

  5. Modedullen

    But when did anybody ever believe anything they saw in an ad – be it for a beauty product (any beauty product), clothes or anything else? Doesn’t everybody now it’s all pure make believe?

  6. Dainty Darling Digits

    Since when is this new news though? Every mascara add seems to either use inserts or photoshop. Not that it makes it any better but it’s commonly done.

  7. The most “natural” is probably Eva Longoria and L’oreal 😉 Anyway, I don’t know who buys mascaras based on the promo image these days…

  8. ShimmerDreamz (Cassie)

    Lash inserts and hair extensions are so common now that I never bother to make too big a fuss, but take the ads with a pinch of salt.

    It’s far more interesting to google whether selebs have these extensions during their everyday routine, when they’re not trying to sell a particular product. (Re. Elena Gilbert’s long hair in Vampire Diaries).

    Incidentally, found it quite interesting that as Georgia’s lashes got bigger, her mouth also opened wider. Very random comment here.

  9. Charlie

    Quite right this is too. But I, like other commentor never believe the pictures for anything much…ever the cynic…

  10. Having worked at a well known mass market cosmetic brand for 2.5yrs working specifically on the media advertising, I know exactly where the industry stands… basically the ‘top brands’ like Rimmel and L’Oreal did it and made the lashes bigger in every new campaign. For the ‘smaller brands’ to even stand a chance at competing they started following suit, and slowly but surely their images started seeing lash inserts and photoshopping creeping in.

    I don’t agree with it and I think it’s ridiculous, but I can understand why everyone now does it… When they don’t, the sales just don’t add up. Sad but true fact. It needs one of the bigger brands to stand up and say ‘no more’ for the industry to change. Nobody believes the images anymore anyway.

    And FYI – one of my final adverts before leaving ended up on Watchdog because it was THAT ridiculous!!

  11. I never believe the beauty ads any more…

  12. Vicky

    Why don’t we just buy really cheap mascara and put the money we save towards lash inserts/falsies if that’s the look we want?

  13. Jeannie D

    I too laugh at Cheryl Cole’s shampoo adverts, but what can you expect when they L’Oreal used to have Beyonce advertising their hair dye screaming ‘Because I’m Worth It’, when she was wearing a FULL WIG!

    People need to use a bit of common sense when reading/watching Beauty adverts. Estee Lauder has 20 year olds advertising their renutriv moisturiser which is supposed to be for middle aged skin! Go figure

  14. Hell Candy Make Up

    I love this post…don’t even get me started on Cheryl Cole and her shampoo ads…drives me so mad.
    The L’Oreal adverts in general really grate me as I can never believe in any of them.

  15. They all do it though, its the consumers now that has to be careful and think twice if they want to believe the add and then if they want to buy the product, unfortunately

  16. Bettina@BeautySwot

    I hate that lash inserts and post production enhancement is made as it gives a totally false impression and perhaps expectation by the consumer. I also think that we do seem to just expect and allow these things, we should all be complaining!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from British Beauty Blogger

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading